How to write peer-reviewed papers

I haven't evaluated any papers , But these blogs & Web pages are very useful ：

1.| Microsoft Conference Management Toolkit Documentationhttps://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/docs/help/index.html

2. How to evaluate an English paper _D.Guan The blog of -CSDN Blog Foreword up to now , I have reviewed three articles . The results were acceptance 、 Refuse 、 modify . It is also a collection of all types . I don't say much nonsense , To the body . What should be written in each section .1. summary ： Explain what this article mainly proposes , What's the result of the experiment .2. advantage . Summarize the advantages of some articles ： For example, the experiment is sufficient ,idea It's new .3. shortcoming ： For example, the structure is not good , Grammar mistakes 、 Format error 、 The experiment was inadequate 、 The result of the paper is incorrect or there are major mistakes, etc , It is best to give a few detailed examples .4. To sum up ： Express you ...https://blog.csdn.net/BRAVE_NO1/article/details/83051039?spm=1001.2101.3001.6650.1&utm_medium=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-2~default~CTRLIST~Rate-1-83051039-blog-82799414.pc_relevant_antiscanv2&depth_1-utm_source=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-2~default~CTRLIST~Rate-1-83051039-blog-82799414.pc_relevant_antiscanv2&utm_relevant_index=2

3.  Review comments on English papers _ How to write English review comments _ Zhang Qizhuo's blog -CSDN Blog Let's start with , I wrote this blog because of Zhang Yiwen's blog . Zhang's blog is actually very good , Personal experience , Very valuable for reference , I read it carefully . But the English comments attached to the blog made me laugh . Let me make a statement here , There was no ridicule , Ostentatious meaning , Because this is the first time that classmate Zhang has written comments on English manuscript review , To be honest, it is much better than the first time I reviewed the manuscript . It's my first time to review English periodicals , It's not an invitation from a journal editor , It's a task assigned by the tutor , Specifically, the chief editor invites the tutor to review the manuscript , The tutor is for the purpose of training me , Let me ...https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_36110344/article/details/113018396?ops_request_misc=%257B%2522request%255Fid%2522%253A%2522165202052216782350976938%2522%252C%2522scm%2522%253A%252220140713.130102334.pc%255Fblog.%2522%257D&request_id=165202052216782350976938&biz_id=0&utm_medium=distribute.pc_search_result.none-task-blog-2~blog~first_rank_ecpm_v1~rank_v31_ecpm-6-113018396-null-null.nonecase&utm_term=%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E8%AE%BA%E6%96%87%E8%AF%84%E5%AE%A1%E6%84%8F%E8%A7%81&spm=1018.2226.3001.4450

4. Review comments on English papers _ English paper review comments template _Sky Li Xiaofeng's blog -CSDN Blog Recently, I was reviewing an English manuscript , First time to do this job , I still don't know how to express . Fortunately, I met my first reviewer , I don't think I'll shoot it , Give him a major revision After receiving . Hehe, I found some fragmentary references on the Internet .+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、 Objectives and results are not clear .It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone wi...https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_28839549/article/details/113018399?spm=1001.2101.3001.6650.1&utm_medium=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-2~default~CTRLIST~Rate-1-113018399-blog-83051039.pc_relevant_antiscanv2&depth_1-utm_source=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-2~default~CTRLIST~Rate-1-113018399-blog-83051039.pc_relevant_antiscanv2&utm_relevant_index=25. And one that forgot which publisher it was "A Peer Review Process Guide"

The screenshot is as follows ：

 

 

 

 References and some other interesting and useful articles/resources about peer review

· Hames, Irene. Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: guidelines for good practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

· McPeek, M. A., D. L. DeAngelis, R. G. Shaw, A. J. Moore, M. D. Rausher, D. R. Strong, A. M. Ellison, L. Barrett, L. Rieseberg, M. D. Breed, J. Sullivan, C. W. Osenberg, M. Holyoak, and M. A. Elgar. 2009. The golden rule of reviewing. American Naturalist 173:E155–E158.

· Nature Masterclass: Focus on Peer Review(free).https://masterclasses.nature.com/courses/205

Design by Suet Chan

  Last , Put in a word ： Let's show mercy , Don't refuse if you can make a big change . We all know why, don't we . If I had the chance to be the peer reviewer , You must not reject the paper out of a dark or irresponsible mentality .